The Netherlands decision to appoint Xavi Hernandez as head coach hasn’t gone down well with everyone.
Xavi was named in the role on a deal through to the end of the 2030 World Cup.
For many it comes as a relief and was seen as a sign of forward thinking by Dutch federation (KNVB) director Nigel de Jong.
The call meant the Netherlands avoided a fourth stint for Louis van Gaal, or even an underwhelming appointment of Michael Reiziger or Roberto Martinez.
However, the fact Xavi isn’t Dutch has upset some, as he will be the first non-native coach of the team in 48 years.
Xavi’s appointment receives mixed response
As the news broke, former international Theo Janssen said on Ziggo: “Don’t do it. I think there should be a Dutch coach.
“In terms of communication and such, it’s a bit more pleasant when a Dutch coach is involved.”
Ajax legend Danny Blind was in agreement, but added more detail for those saying there were no good Dutch options available after Arne Slot rejected the job.
“I would also prefer a Dutchman,” he said. “I think they missed an opportunity with Peter Bosz.
“I suspect if they had pursued that further – even before the World Cup – he would have taken the bait.”
He added: “At least he is child of Dutch football.
“Xavi does indeed have a fondness for Dutch football, which he also makes clear.
“He mentions Cruyff, Van Gaal, Rijkaard. I also believe that you can’t get any closer to the Dutch national team with a foreign coach than with him.”
Ten Hag and Peter Bosz were better options
Former Dutch footballer Hans Kraay took a similar view, adding: “I think the KNVB should have made more of an effort to sign Bosz and Erik ten Hag.
“With Peter Bosz and Erik ten Hag, we would have seen superb attacking football.
“So it turns out to be Xavi: He’s no bungler. He plays attacking football. We can look forward to some beautiful and good football.
“But I would have preferred one of the other three. Now we will fully support Xavi.”
Leave a Reply